Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · California

Giant Chevrolet Co

Visalia, CA · ~68 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Giant Chevrolet Co runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade C.

Giant Chevrolet Co: 2.8 TCR = 84% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Giant Chevrolet Co safety composite

Giant Chevrolet Co scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2017→2024

Giant Chevrolet Co injury rate improved

Giant Chevrolet Co's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.5 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Visalia, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #96/301
  • PHOTO Matt Saxe Chevrolet,…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Matt Saxe Chevrolet, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Giant Chevrolet Co in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Giant Chevrolet Co averages 2.8 TCR (84% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Giant Chevrolet Co TCR series: 2017=2.5 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.4

Where Giant Chevrolet Co falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #96 safest of 301 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in California.

Giant Chevrolet Co (68 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Giant Chevrolet Co
Giant Chevrolet Co (68 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Giant Chevrolet Co has fewer employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2021 3.7 3.7 3 0 0
2020 7.1 4.2 5 0 0
2019 4.8 4.8 3 0 0
2018 3.1 0.0 2 0 0
2017 2.5 2.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · CA · Visalia

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 349 employers in Visalia, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Matt Saxe Chevrolet, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2120 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TOYOTA WEST 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Priority Infiniti 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Valley Land Co. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCFFO 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE VinePro Vineyard Management, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knights Grapevine Nursery 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kaweah Delta Health Care District 4,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paragon Personnel 2,129 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 194 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 473 1,479 FTE
NAT-TCR Coding Products 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR One Way Products, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Caulking and Waterproofing 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Olney Assisted Living 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Castone Corporation 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Window Inc./AWI Installation Services Inc. 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Office and Warehouse Division 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.