janitorial Services · Arizona

Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax

Phoenix, AZ · ~27 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical janitorial Services workplace, earning a grade B.

Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax: 2.8 TCR = 63% of janitorial Services BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax safety composite

Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.8

2017→2024

Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax injury rate improved

Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax's TCR fell 9.8 from 9.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.8 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/69
  • PHOTO Advent Health Ocala …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Advent Health Ocala - EVS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax averages 2.8 TCR (63% of the janitorial Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax TCR series: 2017=9.8 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax falls in its industry

4,064 janitorial Services establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 69 janitorial Services employers in Arizona.

Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax (27 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax
Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax (27 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at United Club Phx Per Pax has fewer employees than the janitorial Services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 10.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 9.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · AZ · Phoenix

4,064 janitorial Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Advent Health Ocala - EVS 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7519_18297 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSSI - 0365 Pilgrim's Corp - Waco 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Christus Santa Rosa - Medical Center 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE TONOPAH BARNS 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEMCO SOUTH COOLING 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shop and Warehouse 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Harquahala Generating Company 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Coding Products 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Chevrolet Co 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR One Way Products, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Caulking and Waterproofing 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE S04000 - WM of RI - Newport 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Alexion Janitorial 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thomas Concrete of Georgia Gainesville 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Team Farrell 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.