Solid waste and recycling collection · New Jersey

Giordano Company

Newark, NJ · ~34 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Giordano Company runs at 385% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Solid waste and recycling collection workplace, earning a grade F.

Giordano Company: 10.0 TCR = 385% of Solid waste and recycling collection BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Giordano Company safety composite

Giordano Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.6

2016→2024

Giordano Company injury rate improved

Giordano Company's TCR fell 19.6 from 19.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 22.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.6 · 2018=22.1 · 2019=21.9 · 2020=7.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=9.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Newark, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 385% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #55/70
  • PHOTO Newark Evergreen Hau…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Newark Evergreen Hauling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Giordano Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Giordano Company averages 10.0 TCR (385% of the Solid waste and recycling collection BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Giordano Company TCR series: 2016=19.6 · 2018=22.1 · 2019=21.9 · 2020=7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=9.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Giordano Company falls in its industry

2,322 Solid waste and recycling coll establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 70 Solid waste and recycling coll employers in New Jersey.

Giordano Company (34 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Giordano Company
Giordano Company (34 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Giordano Company has fewer employees than the Solid waste and recycling collection median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 9.5 9.5 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.0 7.0 2 0 0
2019 21.9 21.9 6 0 0
2018 22.1 15.8 7 0 0
2016 19.6 19.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · NJ · Newark

2,322 Solid waste and recycling collection employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 356 employers in Newark, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Newark Evergreen Hauling 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alpine Disposal Inc. 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Granger Disposal of Alma 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR S03951 - WI Franklin 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE ISE America, Inc Co#3 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grace Construction Management Company, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE V.J. Scozzari and Sons, Inc. Hopewell 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Headquarters 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR EWR 13,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR - Airport United Airlines Offices 13,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-EWR 11,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWRPW9829 EWR - NON AA PAX SER 4,772 FTE
NAT-TCR Bulldog Hose Company, LLC. 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TNE001 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Swamp Rabbit Cafe and Grocery 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 0808 - Fond du Lac 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Architectural Land Design 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smith Power Products Inc. (Sparks) 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE HPJ Industries, Inc. - Deshler 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE S06717 - Raleigh MRF 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.