Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) · California

Gish

San Jose, CA · ~52 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gish runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) workplace, earning a grade C.

Gish: 3.0 TCR = 115% of Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gish safety composite

Gish scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2019→2024

Gish injury rate improved

Gish's TCR fell 6.1 from 7.4 in 2019 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=7.4 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562219 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 115% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #2/21
  • PHOTO LRS - Atkinson
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LRS - Atkinson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Gish in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gish averages 3.0 TCR (115% of the Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gish TCR series: 2019=7.4 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.6

Where Gish falls in its industry

171 Nonhazardous waste treatment a establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 21 Nonhazardous waste treatment a employers in California.

Gish (52 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Gish
Gish (52 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.9

Gish has more employees than the Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2023 3.6 3.6 0 2 0
2022 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.7 1.4 2 0 0
2019 7.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562219 · CA · San Jose

171 Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LRS - Atkinson 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR VEXOR Technology LLC dba Circon Environmental 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LRS - North Liberty IA 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LRS - Maywood 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phil Foster Ranch 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Ivanhoe 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brassfield Estate Vineyard 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR CSH Linden Site 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pueblo CO Weld Plant 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Middletown, Oh 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Motion Plant 3 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Broussard 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chapel Valley Landscape - Richmond 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pirtek USA 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Missouri AgriService LLC - Marshall 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.