Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing · Ohio

G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace

Franklin Furnace, OH · ~212 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace: 3.9 TCR = 118% of Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace safety composite

G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2019→2022

G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace injury rate improved

G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace's TCR fell 2.8 from 5.5 in 2019 to 2.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.5 · 2020=3.5 · 2022=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312111 · Franklin Furnace, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 118% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #9/17
  • PHOTO EVERFRESH BEVERAGES …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~212 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EVERFRESH BEVERAGES INC MIAMI DSD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace averages 3.9 TCR (118% of the Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace TCR series: 2019=5.5 · 2020=3.5 · 2022=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace falls in its industry

516 Beverages, soft drink (includi establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 17 Beverages, soft drink (includi employers in Ohio.

G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace (212 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace
G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace (212 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8

G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace has more employees than the Beverages, soft drink (including artific median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.7 1.4 10 0 0
2020 3.5 1.5 7 0 0
2019 5.5 3.0 7 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312111 · OH · Franklin Furnace

516 Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 8 employers in Franklin Furnace, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EVERFRESH BEVERAGES INC MIAMI DSD 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX - Irving - 2304 Century Center Blvd - The American Bottling Company 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt Vernon 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bay Center Foods 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bilfinger Westcon Canton OH - BSL 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burrows - Franklin 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Momentive Performance Materials 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fecon, LLC 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR G & J Pepsi Cola Bottlers- Franklin Furnace 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Big Sandy Distribution (11) 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR SunCoke Energy Haverhill Operations 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR O&M Haverhill 50 FTE
NAT-TCR Flying Food Group 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HG863 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vasco Road Landfill 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR St Johns Lutheran Comm Fountain Lake 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. Boise 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCH Electric 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Contractors LLC 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gallo Sales Company 212 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.