Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · South Carolina

GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc

Orangeburg, SC · ~135 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc safety composite

GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc held a steady TCR band

GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.0 in 2022 to 2.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.0 · 2023=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Orangeburg, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Northstar Aerospace …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Northstar Aerospace (Phoenix) 401 Building (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc TCR series: 2022=2 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in South Carolina.

GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc (135 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc
GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc (135 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 1.0 1 1 0
2022 2.0 1.3 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · SC · Orangeburg

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 79 employers in Orangeburg, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Northstar Aerospace (Phoenix) 401 Building 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR UT011 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exacta Aerospace 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Laurens Container 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dewey 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE US6 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Creform Corporation 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regional Medical Center 1,530 FTE
CITY-NEAR Husqvarna Consumer Outdoor Products 1,287 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Regional Medical Center 1,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR MUSC Health Orangeburg 1,155 FTE
NAT-TCR FLEXcon MA 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Arthur G. Russell Company 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DW Loiselle Water Treatment Plant 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ihop 3308 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE TX.DALLA.67 - Ricoh Americas Holdings, Inc 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prospect Park Alliance 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Super Stop & Shop 0567 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Super Stop & Shop 0599 135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.