Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Arkansas

Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs

Hot Springs, AR · ~354 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs safety composite

Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs held a steady TCR band

Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.1 in 2023 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=2.1 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Hot Springs, AR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO TRIUMPH Systems, Ele…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~354 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs TCR series: 2023=2.1 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Arkansas.

Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs (354 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs
Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs (354 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.5 7 0 0
2023 2.1 1.1 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · AR · Hot Springs

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 112 employers in Hot Springs, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northstar Aerospace (Phoenix) 401 Building 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR UT011 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rockline Industries Booneville 354 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ozark Health 354 FTE
STATE-SIZE Easterseals Arkansas Center of Training & Wellness 352 FTE
STATE-SIZE Navy Road, P-19719 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR 03080001-030802 CHI ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-03080001-030802 1,198 FTE
CITY-NEAR NATIONAL PARK MEDICAL CENTER 690 FTE
NAT-TCR The Ruhlin Company 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR STR0613 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR STK Electronics, Inc. DBA Pelco Component Technologies 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 229 Edwardsville 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bruker Scientific LLC 354 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mestek, Inc 354 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plainridge Park Casino 354 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kansas 354 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.