Food processing plant construction · California

Glass Onion Catering

Richmond, CA · ~118 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glass Onion Catering runs at 382% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food processing plant construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Glass Onion Catering: 11.1 TCR = 382% of Food processing plant construction BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glass Onion Catering safety composite

Glass Onion Catering scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2020→2024

Glass Onion Catering injury rate improved

Glass Onion Catering's TCR fell 4.2 from 10.6 in 2020 to 6.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=10.6 · 2021=24.0 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Richmond, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.1 · 382% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #70/78
  • PHOTO 11689 ALPHA, INC.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 11689 ALPHA, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Glass Onion Catering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glass Onion Catering averages 11.1 TCR (382% of the Food processing plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glass Onion Catering TCR series: 2020=10.6 · 2021=24 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 2.9

Where Glass Onion Catering falls in its industry

924 Food processing plant construc establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 78 Food processing plant construc employers in California.

Glass Onion Catering (118 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Glass Onion Catering
Glass Onion Catering (118 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Glass Onion Catering has more employees than the Food processing plant construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 6.4 4 4 0
2023 3.3 2.0 5 0 0
2021 24.0 13.5 25 0 0
2020 10.6 3.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · CA · Richmond

924 Food processing plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 11689 ALPHA, INC. 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rogue Truss Systems 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA043 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coronado Stone Products-Phoenix 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Prestige Farming inc 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cipponeri Orchards 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHC Facilities, Inc. dba The Plug DTLA 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plug Connection - Lodi 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR Westin Nanea Ocean Villas 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Trail Ridge 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Suffolk Bickford 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyer Farms 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ohwtc - West Chester Distribution Ctr - 11469 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Luther Woods SNF LLC 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anchor Bay Packaging Corporation - Plant 4 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Center of Morristown 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.