Acrylic spun yarns made from purchased fiber · North Carolina

Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc

Burlington, NC · ~135 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Acrylic spun yarns made from purchased fiber workplace, earning a grade A.

Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Acrylic spun yarns made from purchased fiber BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc safety composite

Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc held a steady TCR band

Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 313110 · Burlington, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/74
  • PHOTO Parkdale Mills, Inc.…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Parkdale Mills, Inc. Plant 68 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Acrylic spun yarns made from purchased fiber BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc falls in its industry

195 Acrylic spun yarns made from p establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 74 Acrylic spun yarns made from p employers in North Carolina.

Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc (135 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc
Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc (135 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, LLc has fewer employees than the Acrylic spun yarns made from purchased f median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.5 0.7 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.7 0.8 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

313110 · NC · Burlington

195 Acrylic spun yarns made from purchased fiber employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 148 employers in Burlington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Parkdale Mills, Inc. Plant 68 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 21 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Syntec Corporate 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden Valley Plant 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Edifice LLC 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCCo-CAR 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pure Power Contractors, LLC 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE South-Fair Electric 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR National OnDemand, Inc 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR Twin Lakes Community 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR York Road 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County 373 FTE
NAT-TCR Nucor Steel Decatur, LLC. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Winslow 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CMC Rebar Coating Waxahachie 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Convent Plant 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE SFO Dairy Lane 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Chicago Packing LLC 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Steel Arkansas 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Braskem Marcus Hook Facility 135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.