Continuing care retirement communities · North Carolina

Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County

Burlington, NC · ~373 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade C.

Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County: 3.7 TCR = 97% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County safety composite

Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County injury rate improved

Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County's TCR fell 0.4 from 4.0 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=3.5 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Burlington, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 97% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #26/105
  • PHOTO Atrium
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~373 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atrium (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County averages 3.7 TCR (97% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=3.5 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 105 Continuing care retirement com employers in North Carolina.

Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County (373 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County
Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County (373 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.3 11 1 0
2017 3.5 3.1 8 1 0
2016 4.0 2.4 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Burlington

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 148 employers in Burlington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atrium 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cambridge Terrace (Albany) 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belvedere Senior Housing 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2510 Conover Folding 373 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Imagine Group 373 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant 373 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kaba Ilco Corporation 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR National OnDemand, Inc 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR Twin Lakes Community 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR York Road 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1287 364 FTE
NAT-TCR Galena Nursing Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza del Caribe 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bangor Health Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cambria FabShop Indianapolis LLC 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Geisinger Bloomsburg Hospital 373 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primient Loudon Plant 373 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baylor Health Enterprises, L.P. 373 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clearwater 373 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.