Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Maryland

Glenmont Rail Division

Silver Spring, MD · ~188 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glenmont Rail Division runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade C.

Glenmont Rail Division: 4.1 TCR = 92% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glenmont Rail Division safety composite

Glenmont Rail Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2018→2022

Glenmont Rail Division injury rate improved

Glenmont Rail Division's TCR fell 1.8 from 4.2 in 2018 to 2.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Silver Spring, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 92% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #11/20
  • PHOTO 55600 OCTA Irvine
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~188 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 55600 OCTA Irvine (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Glenmont Rail Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glenmont Rail Division averages 4.1 TCR (92% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glenmont Rail Division TCR series: 2018=4.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=4 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=2.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Glenmont Rail Division falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 20 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in Maryland.

Glenmont Rail Division (188 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Glenmont Rail Division
Glenmont Rail Division (188 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Glenmont Rail Division has fewer employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.4 2.4 3 2 0
2021 6.9 6.9 8 6 0
2020 4.0 3.4 6 1 0
2019 3.1 3.1 6 0 0
2018 4.2 4.2 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · MD · Silver Spring

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 160 employers in Silver Spring, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 55600 OCTA Irvine 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shady Grove Rail Yard 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR METRO 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mangrove 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harris Mid-Atlantic, LLC 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daly Computers, Inc. 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cambridge 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 6653 188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring 3,228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring-HCH-MD 2,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist HealthCare, Inc., d/b/a Adventist HealthCare White Oak Medical Center 1,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riderwood Village 1,375 FTE
NAT-TCR Brasington Bailey Construction, Inc 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Avista Mission HQ 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Heartland Lafayette 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Drury Inn & Suites - Cleveland Beachwood 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Broulim's Rigby 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lanier Village Estates 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE 725 - Bucktown 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE ZRC Minneapolis 188 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.