Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

Glenwell

Cheektowaga, NY · ~54 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glenwell runs at 270% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Glenwell: 10.3 TCR = 270% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glenwell safety composite

Glenwell scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2024

Glenwell injury rate improved

Glenwell's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 55.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=55.8 · 2021=47.1 · 2022=19.3 · 2023=7.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Cheektowaga, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 270% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #213/283
  • PHOTO Quail Park of Lynnwood
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quail Park of Lynnwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Glenwell in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glenwell averages 10.3 TCR (270% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glenwell TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=55.8 · 2021=47.1 · 2022=19.3 · 2023=7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Glenwell falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #213 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Glenwell (54 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Glenwell
Glenwell (54 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Glenwell has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 7.0 4.6 3 0 0
2022 19.3 1.8 1 10 0
2021 47.1 2.5 1 18 0
2020 55.8 0.0 0 26 0
2019 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.9 1.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Cheektowaga

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 150 employers in Cheektowaga, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quail Park of Lynnwood 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harborhill Place 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR RM-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR ROCKY MOUNT 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Grove Care & Wellness ALF 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lincoln Dairy 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kast Farms Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roseton Generating LLC 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE W. 30th Street Substation 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Buffalo 1,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Force 548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sisters of Charity Hospital, St. Joseph Campus 457 FTE
CITY-NEAR Visiting Nurses Association - Erie 407 FTE
NAT-TCR Badger Railing Inc. 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CHT 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Champion 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Iron County Road Commission 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Salina Haulage 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Immucor Warren 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.L. Adler Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Artis Senior Living of Boca Raton 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.