Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Quail Park of Lynnwood

Lynnwood, WA · ~122 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quail Park of Lynnwood runs at 270% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Quail Park of Lynnwood: 10.3 TCR = 270% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quail Park of Lynnwood safety composite

Quail Park of Lynnwood scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−23.4

2017→2023

Quail Park of Lynnwood injury rate improved

Quail Park of Lynnwood's TCR fell 23.4 from 23.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 23.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=23.4 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=12.8 · 2020=6.8 · 2022=10.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Lynnwood, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 270% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #116/216
  • PHOTO Glenwell
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Glenwell (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Quail Park of Lynnwood in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quail Park of Lynnwood averages 10.3 TCR (270% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quail Park of Lynnwood TCR series: 2017=23.4 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=12.8 · 2020=6.8 · 2022=10.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Quail Park of Lynnwood falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #116 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Quail Park of Lynnwood (122 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Quail Park of Lynnwood
Quail Park of Lynnwood (122 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Quail Park of Lynnwood has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 10.8 5.9 11 0 0
2020 6.8 5.5 5 0 0
2019 12.8 9.6 5 3 0
2018 7.7 7.7 5 0 0
2017 23.4 16.5 16 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Lynnwood

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 112 employers in Lynnwood, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Glenwell 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harborhill Place 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR RM-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR ROCKY MOUNT 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Grove Care & Wellness ALF 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE King Organics Inc 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE America's Finest Fishing LLC 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE FV American Dynasty 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stacy and Witbeck/Kuney, A Joint Venture - Redmond Link Extension 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eldec Aerospace Corp. 741 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Lynnwood 542 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1190 - LYNNWOOD WA WHSE 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00180 297 FTE
NAT-TCR Old Europe Cheese, Inc. 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Buttura and Sons Inc 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Reliant Processing-Guymon Plant 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Montpelier Hauling 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grandview Care Center 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chase Ranch 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lancaster 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE MO008 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.