Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge · Florida

GLF Construction Corporation

Miami, FL · ~257 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GLF Construction Corporation runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge workplace, earning a grade C.

GLF Construction Corporation: 2.3 TCR = 83% of Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GLF Construction Corporation safety composite

GLF Construction Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2020

GLF Construction Corporation injury rate improved

GLF Construction Corporation's TCR fell 1.3 from 4.1 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2020=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Miami, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 83% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #67/174
  • PHOTO Atlas Batesville
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~257 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atlas Batesville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

GLF Construction Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GLF Construction Corporation averages 2.3 TCR (83% of the Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GLF Construction Corporation TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=0 · 2020=2.8 · BLS 2.8

Where GLF Construction Corporation falls in its industry

4,078 Construction management, highw establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 174 Construction management, highw employers in Florida.

GLF Construction Corporation (257 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate GLF Construction Corporation
GLF Construction Corporation (257 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

GLF Construction Corporation has more employees than the Construction management, highway, road, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.8 1.9 9 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.1 4.1 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · FL · Miami

4,078 Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,467 employers in Miami, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atlas Batesville 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LTM, Incorporated dba Knife River Materials Coos Bay 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works Bridge and Street Operations 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR riverside construction co. 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE MEISNER ELECTRIC 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE Omnicell - St. Petersburg 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eastern Metal Supply Lake Worth 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quirch Foods - Coral Gables 257 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-MIA-MIAMI-MIA-TRML 9,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospital of Miami Inc. 6,876 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIACX0UPS MIA UPS 3,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Miami 2,879 FTE
NAT-TCR Kona Station 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Signature Flight Support Cedar Rapids 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Oncor Distribution Operations Southeast 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Avalon Communication Services 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Public Facilities 257 FTE
NAT-SIZE 66 Boerum Place 257 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triton Stone Group of New Orleans 257 FTE
NAT-SIZE TI Group Automotive Systems LLC 257 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.