Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Indiana

TI Group Automotive Systems LLC

Ossian, IN · ~257 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TI Group Automotive Systems LLC runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

TI Group Automotive Systems LLC: 3.5 TCR = 65% of Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TI Group Automotive Systems LLC safety composite

TI Group Automotive Systems LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2019

TI Group Automotive Systems LLC injury rate improved

TI Group Automotive Systems LLC's TCR fell 2.2 from 4.3 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Ossian, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 65% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #39/66
  • PHOTO Benteler Automotive
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~257 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Benteler Automotive (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

TI Group Automotive Systems LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TI Group Automotive Systems LLC averages 3.5 TCR (65% of the Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TI Group Automotive Systems LLC TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.1 · BLS 5.4

Where TI Group Automotive Systems LLC falls in its industry

772 Gas tanks assembled, automotiv establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 66 Gas tanks assembled, automotiv employers in Indiana.

TI Group Automotive Systems LLC (257 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate TI Group Automotive Systems LLC
TI Group Automotive Systems LLC (257 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

TI Group Automotive Systems LLC has more employees than the Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.1 2.1 5 0 0
2018 3.1 2.3 8 0 0
2017 4.6 2.3 9 3 0
2016 4.3 2.8 13 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · IN · Ossian

772 Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 10 employers in Ossian, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Benteler Automotive 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Safe Fleet 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fuel Total Systems, TN 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnode A division of Shape Corp - State Street 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rockport Plant 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE Citizens Energy Group-SFS 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trin Inc 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thor Motor Coach/Plant 150 257 FTE
CITY-NEAR TI Fluid System - Ossian 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berne Apparel Company 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ossian Health & Rehabilitation Center 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berne Apparel Comapany 96 FTE
NAT-TCR Mantz Automation INC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Millett 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Specialty Fulfillment : UGA2 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AR Lamp Manufacturing 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Triton Stone Group of New Orleans 257 FTE
NAT-SIZE A-Brite Plating 257 FTE
NAT-SIZE 66 Boerum Place 257 FTE
NAT-SIZE GLF Construction Corporation 257 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.