Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) · Alabama

Glidewell Specialties Foundry

Calera, AL · ~122 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glidewell Specialties Foundry runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) workplace, earning a grade C.

Glidewell Specialties Foundry: 2.9 TCR = 88% of Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glidewell Specialties Foundry safety composite

Glidewell Specialties Foundry scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Glidewell Specialties Foundry: 2.8 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2024

Glidewell Specialties Foundry's TCR rose 1.2 from 2.8 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331511 · Calera, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 88% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #9/18
  • PHOTO AAM New Castle
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AAM New Castle (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Glidewell Specialties Foundry in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glidewell Specialties Foundry averages 2.9 TCR (88% of the Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glidewell Specialties Foundry TCR series: 2017=2.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Glidewell Specialties Foundry falls in its industry

272 Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 18 Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile employers in Alabama.

Glidewell Specialties Foundry (122 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Glidewell Specialties Foundry
Glidewell Specialties Foundry (122 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Glidewell Specialties Foundry has more employees than the Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 1.6 5 0 0
2023 3.1 2.3 4 0 0
2022 2.1 1.4 3 0 0
2021 2.4 0.0 3 0 0
2020 3.3 0.8 4 0 0
2018 2.6 0.7 4 0 0
2017 2.8 1.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331511 · AL · Calera

272 Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 30 employers in Calera, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AAM New Castle 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR McWane Ductile New Jersey 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mapleton Foundry 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frazier Ind. 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Esfeller Construction Company 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fite Construction Company, LLC 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sparks Energy INC 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carcel & G Construction, LLC 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Service Complex 771 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Service Complex - APC 685 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3271 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Central AL 308 FTE
NAT-TCR High West Distillery 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hawaii Office 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #174 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Pressed Brick & Tile CO 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Modernistic, Inc. 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rouses Market #22 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shenango Presbyterian SeniorCare 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redner's Warehouse Market Joppatown 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.