Doors, safe and vault, metal, manufacturing · New Jersey

Global Partners in Shielding, Inc

Fairfield, NJ · ~25 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Global Partners in Shielding, Inc runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Doors, safe and vault, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Global Partners in Shielding, Inc: 5.8 TCR = 175% of Doors, safe and vault, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Global Partners in Shielding, Inc safety composite

Global Partners in Shielding, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.4

2016→2023

Global Partners in Shielding, Inc injury rate improved

Global Partners in Shielding, Inc's TCR fell 12.4 from 12.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.4 · 2017=4.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=13.4 · 2020=5.9 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Fairfield, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 175% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/12
  • PHOTO EGA Brookfield WI
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EGA Brookfield WI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Global Partners in Shielding, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Global Partners in Shielding, Inc averages 5.8 TCR (175% of the Doors, safe and vault, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Global Partners in Shielding, Inc TCR series: 2016=12.4 · 2017=4 · 2018=0 · 2019=13.4 · 2020=5.9 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Global Partners in Shielding, Inc falls in its industry

827 Doors, safe and vault, metal, establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 12 Doors, safe and vault, metal, employers in New Jersey.

Global Partners in Shielding, Inc (25 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Global Partners in Shielding, Inc
Global Partners in Shielding, Inc (25 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Global Partners in Shielding, Inc has fewer employees than the Doors, safe and vault, metal, manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 5.9 5.9 1 0 0
2019 13.4 8.9 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2016 12.4 2.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · NJ · Fairfield

827 Doors, safe and vault, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 88 employers in Fairfield, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EGA Brookfield WI 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cogitic Corporation 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arrow Tool & Stamping Co., Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mayville South 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bayonne NJ 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vaspro, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Servpro of Cape May and Cumberland Counties 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Concrete Cutting Inc. 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Middle Atlantic Products-Fairfield 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legrand AV Inc. 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1175 - Fairfield 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR Weiss-Aug Surgical Products 241 FTE
NAT-TCR LBH Inc. 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Olympic Tug & Barge, Inc 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Moline MI MI 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100057 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE National Pump Company (MS) 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 0104 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holstein Senior Living 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 0213 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.