Primary refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum) · Pennsylvania

Global Tungsten and Powders Corp.

Towanda, PA · ~432 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Global Tungsten and Powders Corp. runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Primary refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum) workplace, earning a grade C.

Global Tungsten and Powders Corp.: 2.9 TCR = 87% of Primary refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum) BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Global Tungsten and Powders Corp. safety composite

Global Tungsten and Powders Corp. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Global Tungsten and Powders Corp.: 2.3 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2021

Global Tungsten and Powders Corp.'s TCR rose 0.4 from 2.3 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331410 · Towanda, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 87% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Quemetco INC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 58 inj
  • SIZE ~432 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quemetco INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Global Tungsten and Powders Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Global Tungsten and Powders Corp. averages 2.9 TCR (87% of the Primary refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Global Tungsten and Powders Corp. TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Global Tungsten and Powders Corp. falls in its industry

57 Primary refining of nonferrous establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Primary refining of nonferrous employers in Pennsylvania.

Global Tungsten and Powders Corp. (432 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Global Tungsten and Powders Corp.
Global Tungsten and Powders Corp. (432 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Global Tungsten and Powders Corp. has more employees than the Primary refining of nonferrous metals (e median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.6 2.1 9 2 0
2020 2.3 1.2 7 1 0
2019 3.5 1.6 13 0 0
2018 5.7 2.6 17 5 0
2017 0.8 0.0 3 0 0
2016 2.3 0.9 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331410 · PA · Towanda

57 Primary refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 25 employers in Towanda, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quemetco INC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zircoa 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Metals Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Muller Copper Line Sets 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Knouse Foods Coop, Inc - Peach Glen 432 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1935 432 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wabash Jonestown 433 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Kingstown Terminal - DOT 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America : Towanda 467 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Tungsten & Powders LLC 463 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0310 - Fiber-Pennsylvania 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Robert Packer Hospital Towanda Campus 373 FTE
NAT-TCR VTI Architectural Wood Products Holstein 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR VDI Granite Bay Office 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR USG Corporation Chicago Construction 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 2077-Us Dd Nw Vallejo Branch 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cypress Village 432 FTE
NAT-SIZE O-AT-KA Milk Products Cooperative, Inc. 432 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hi-Lex Controls (HCIH) 432 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trimble Inc. Corporate HQ 432 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.