Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Hawks Ridge Assisted Living

Hood River, OR · ~41 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hawks Ridge Assisted Living runs at 382% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Hawks Ridge Assisted Living: 14.5 TCR = 382% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hawks Ridge Assisted Living safety composite

Hawks Ridge Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.4

2016→2022

Hawks Ridge Assisted Living injury rate improved

Hawks Ridge Assisted Living's TCR fell 14.4 from 14.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 38.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.4 · 2017=38.0 · 2018=28.7 · 2019=17.3 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Hood River, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.5 · 382% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #162/218
  • PHOTO The Birches at Harle…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Birches at Harleysville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Hawks Ridge Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hawks Ridge Assisted Living averages 14.5 TCR (382% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hawks Ridge Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=14.4 · 2017=38 · 2018=28.7 · 2019=17.3 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Hawks Ridge Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #162 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Hawks Ridge Assisted Living (41 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hawks Ridge Assisted Living
Hawks Ridge Assisted Living (41 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Hawks Ridge Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2019 17.3 13.9 5 0 0
2018 28.7 7.8 11 0 0
2017 38.0 0.0 12 0 0
2016 14.4 14.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Hood River

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 55 employers in Hood River, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Birches at Harleysville 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR State College, Elmcroft of 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSL-Glenwood Village of Overland Park 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cadence Lakewood 14.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schwope Brothers West Coast 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE JR Simplot Company-ZX Ranch 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Logging 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE LBA Contract Cutting Inc 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000560 528 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR362 PROVIDENCE HOOD RIVER MEMORIAL HOSP-HOOD 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hood River IG 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardinal IG -Hood River IG 366 FTE
NAT-TCR Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ISD 991- ELC Montevideo 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Boise Store - 11 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-00994 14.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE AGE Cibolo Corrugated Plant 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2967-DE63 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE KBI Biopharma - Woodlands 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE HDS-Cedar Falls 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.