Meat extracts made from purchased carcasses · Alabama

Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division

Opelika, AL · ~320 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Meat extracts made from purchased carcasses workplace, earning a grade A.

Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division: 1.2 TCR = 37% of Meat extracts made from purchased carcasses BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division safety composite

Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

84/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2021→2024

Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division injury rate improved

Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.7 in 2021 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.7 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · Opelika, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO US03 Minong Link Sna…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~320 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: US03 Minong Link Snacks Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division averages 1.2 TCR (37% of the Meat extracts made from purchased carcasses BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division TCR series: 2021=1.7 · 2022=1 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division falls in its industry

613 Meat extracts made from purcha establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Meat extracts made from purcha employers in Alabama.

Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division (320 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division
Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division (320 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Golden State Foods Opelika Protein Division has more employees than the Meat extracts made from purchased carcas median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.0 2 0 0
2023 1.5 0.4 4 0 0
2022 1.0 0.3 3 0 0
2021 1.7 1.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · AL · Opelika

613 Meat extracts made from purchased carcasses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 87 employers in Opelika, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR US03 Minong Link Snacks Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carl Buddig & Company-16615 Vincennes Drive 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR K2D dba Colorado Premium 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jack Links Bellevue Plant 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE STERIS Corporation 320 FTE
STATE-SIZE 762 320 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5703 320 FTE
STATE-SIZE 329 320 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6095 849 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6095 843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mando America Corporation 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanwha Advanced Materials America LLC. Opelika 470 FTE
NAT-TCR The Scotts Company - Groveland 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pike Gas Services, LLC South Carolina Statewide Operations 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bennett Pump Company 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Penick Forest Products, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE John Deere Seeding Group Valley City 320 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8010120 Johnsonville Sausage Sheboygan Falls 320 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rivergate Terrace 320 FTE
NAT-SIZE Juana Diaz, PR 320 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.