All other miscellaneous electrical equipment and c · Michigan

Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies

Troy, MI · ~21 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies runs at 569% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical All other miscellaneous electrical equipment and c workplace, earning a grade F.

Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies: 18.8 TCR = 569% of All other miscellaneous electrical equipment and c BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies safety composite

Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies: 17.0 → 22.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 22.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2019

Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies's TCR rose 5.4 from 17.0 in 2017 to 22.4 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335999 · Troy, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.8 · 569% of ind

  • DART 11.2 DART
  • RANK #12/12
  • PHOTO Schumacher Electric …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Schumacher Electric Corporation - Dallas (1.9 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies averages 18.8 TCR (569% of the All other miscellaneous electrical equipment and c BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies TCR series: 2017=17 · 2018=16.9 · 2019=22.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies falls in its industry

219 All other miscellaneous electr establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 12 All other miscellaneous electr employers in Michigan.

Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies (21 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies
Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies (21 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies has fewer employees than the All other miscellaneous electrical equip median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 22.4 11.2 2 0 0
2018 16.9 0.0 4 1 0
2017 17.0 4.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335999 · MI · Troy

219 All other miscellaneous electrical equipment and c employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 237 employers in Troy, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Schumacher Electric Corporation - Dallas 20.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc. 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schumacher Electric Corporation - Hoopeston 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms Sturgis 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE BE Cultivation 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4605_15228 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willard DeHaan & Son Grnhs 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-309 5,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Troy - Maple Road 1,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters 1,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Troy - Maple Road 1,361 FTE
NAT-TCR Jack in the Box #455 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Yerinv-Atcs-Yerington,Nv - Nevada 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dunlop Manufacturing, Inc. 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Parallel 33 Fingerjoint 18.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marden Enterprises Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gull Harbour 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alside Supply Center #170 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Batesville-Central Florida CSC 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.