Inverters, solid-state, manufacturing · Connecticut

Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc.

Waterbury, CT · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc. runs at 436% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Inverters, solid-state, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc.: 14.4 TCR = 436% of Inverters, solid-state, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc. safety composite

Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2023→2024

Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc. injury rate improved

Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.3 from 15.5 in 2023 to 13.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=15.5 · 2024=13.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335999 · Waterbury, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.4 · 436% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #9/9
  • PHOTO MTR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. (3.7 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc. averages 14.4 TCR (436% of the Inverters, solid-state, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc. TCR series: 2023=15.5 · 2024=13.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc. falls in its industry

219 Inverters, solid-state, manufa establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 9 Inverters, solid-state, manufa employers in Connecticut.

Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 14.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc.
Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 14.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Industrial Drives and Controls, Inc. has fewer employees than the Inverters, solid-state, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.2 7.9 5 0 0
2023 15.5 12.9 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335999 · CT · Waterbury

219 Inverters, solid-state, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 218 employers in Waterbury, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MTR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gonzalez Manufacturing Technologies 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schumacher Electric Corporation - Hoopeston 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schumacher Electric Corporation - Dallas 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Herb Holden Trucking, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Waterbury Freight 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mattern Construction Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE City Of Meriden Public Works 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Mary's Hospital 1,654 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waterbury Hospital 1,472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hartford-Saint Mary's Hospital 1,292 FTE
CITY-NEAR Naugatuck Valley Community College 1,277 FTE
NAT-TCR 001 - Grandville Operations 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Praha Village 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 4502 - Valley Truss Plant 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR RK-116-Glascow ( RK-116 ) 14.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Imdc, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dundee Products 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manhattan Mechanical Contractors INC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marshall Location 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.