Skilled nursing facilities · Arizona

Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley

Prescott Valley, AZ · ~78 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley: 10.8 TCR = 166% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley safety composite

Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley: 5.7 → 15.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 15.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.55× in 2023

Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley's TCR rose 10.1 from 5.7 in 2017 to 15.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Prescott Valley, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.8 · 166% of ind

  • DART 5.9 DART
  • RANK #111/130
  • PHOTO Estates of Naperville
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Estates of Naperville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley averages 10.8 TCR (166% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley TCR series: 2017=5.7 · 2023=15.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 130 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Arizona.

Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley (78 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley
Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley (78 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Good Samaritan Society - Prescott Valley has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 15.8 5.9 7 1 0
2017 5.7 4.3 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · AZ · Prescott Valley

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 55 employers in Prescott Valley, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Estates of Naperville 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Payette of Cascadia LLC 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Willow Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Harmony Care Center 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE GWRC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sollers Construction, LLC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Davis And Sons Doors LLC 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR HUMBOLDT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 692 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yavapai Regional Medical Center-East 563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prescott Valley Retail Support Center - Ace Hardware 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR MI Windows and Doors 362 FTE
NAT-TCR Chaucer Foods INC 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Les Schwab Tire Center-Lake Oswego 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Payette of Cascadia LLC 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakes & Parkhurst Glass 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oracle Elevator Holdco Inc Fort Lauderdale 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bbec LLC 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodruff Manor 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.