Homes for the aged with nursing care · New York

Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson

Port Jefferson, NY · ~37 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson runs at 289% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the aged with nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson: 18.8 TCR = 289% of Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson safety composite

Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson: 14.7 → 22.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 22.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.22× in 2024

Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson's TCR rose 8.1 from 14.7 in 2023 to 22.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Port Jefferson, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.8 · 289% of ind

  • DART 22.8 DART
  • RANK #577/616
  • PHOTO Montebello Care Center
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Montebello Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson averages 18.8 TCR (289% of the Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson TCR series: 2023=14.7 · 2024=22.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursin establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #577 safest of 616 Homes for the aged with nursin employers in New York.

Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson (37 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson
Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson (37 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Good Shepherd Hospice- IPU Port Jefferson has fewer employees than the Homes for the aged with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 22.8 22.8 7 0 0
2023 14.7 3.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Port Jefferson

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 17 employers in Port Jefferson, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Montebello Care Center 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR La Jolla Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bria Health Services 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Residence at Peal Street 18.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kludt Brothers Inc. 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE PharmaCann Hamptonburgh 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cruikshank Farms LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main farm 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR John T. Mather Memorial Hospital 2,510 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Charles Hospital, Catholic Health Services 1,836 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Charles Hospital 1,492 FTE
CITY-NEAR 75 North Country Rd 662 FTE
NAT-TCR Montebello Care Center 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Parallel 33 Fingerjoint 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dunlop Manufacturing, Inc. 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Yerinv-Atcs-Yerington,Nv - Nevada 18.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE South Carolina 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Trail Ridge 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE MECS Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Okmulgee Terrace 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.