Homes for the aged with nursing care · Massachusetts

The Residence at Peal Street

Reading, MA · ~91 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Residence at Peal Street runs at 289% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the aged with nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

The Residence at Peal Street: 18.8 TCR = 289% of Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Residence at Peal Street safety composite

The Residence at Peal Street scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Residence at Peal Street: 12.6 → 25.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 25.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2020

The Residence at Peal Street's TCR rose 12.4 from 12.6 in 2018 to 25.0 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Reading, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.8 · 289% of ind

  • DART 21.1 DART
  • RANK #389/423
  • PHOTO La Jolla Nursing and…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: La Jolla Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

The Residence at Peal Street in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Residence at Peal Street averages 18.8 TCR (289% of the Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Residence at Peal Street TCR series: 2018=12.6 · 2020=25 · BLS 6.5

Where The Residence at Peal Street falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursin establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #389 safest of 423 Homes for the aged with nursin employers in Massachusetts.

The Residence at Peal Street (91 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Residence at Peal Street
The Residence at Peal Street (91 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Residence at Peal Street has fewer employees than the Homes for the aged with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 25.0 21.1 0 13 0
2018 12.6 3.6 2 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MA · Reading

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 20 employers in Reading, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR La Jolla Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bria Health Services 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autumn Care of Nash 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Montebello Care Center 18.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Weston Nurseries 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wise Construction 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Boston Construction 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSI NE 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eliassen Group, LLC 2,220 FTE
CITY-NEAR Weston & Sampson Engineering, Inc. 652 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #60 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reading Store 147 FTE
NAT-TCR Bria Health Services 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR La Jolla Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Columbus 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Parts Authority Pico Rivera 18.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marel, Inc. Des Moines 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE MPS Anzon LLC 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE TF METAL USA LLC (Formally Known As Fuji Autotech USA) 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sher-Rockee Mushroom Farms,LLC 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.