MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Texas

Good Shepherd Medical Associates

Longview, TX · ~317 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Good Shepherd Medical Associates runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Good Shepherd Medical Associates: 1.4 TCR = 38% of MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Good Shepherd Medical Associates safety composite

Good Shepherd Medical Associates scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2017

Good Shepherd Medical Associates injury rate improved

Good Shepherd Medical Associates's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.9 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Longview, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #25/82
  • PHOTO Physicians East, P.A…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~317 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Physicians East, P.A.- Corporate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Good Shepherd Medical Associates in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Good Shepherd Medical Associates averages 1.4 TCR (38% of the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Good Shepherd Medical Associates TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=0.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Good Shepherd Medical Associates falls in its industry

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 82 MDs' (medical doctors, except employers in Texas.

Good Shepherd Medical Associates (317 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Good Shepherd Medical Associates
Good Shepherd Medical Associates (317 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Good Shepherd Medical Associates has more employees than the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2016 1.9 0.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · TX · Longview

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 259 employers in Longview, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Physicians East, P.A.- Corporate 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOC F - 3572 Corporate Court 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blue Ridge HealthCare Medical Group, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MIDDLESEX HEALTH OUTPATIENT/SURGICAL CENTER 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE KCK Utility Construction 317 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moss Utilities 317 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockford Corporation 317 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mykawa 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longview - GSMC 155 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Shepherd Medical Center - Longview 1,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Chemical Company 1,535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Operations 1,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Carroll House Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryerson- Los Angeles 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR DSL_JACKSONVILLE_8001_FL 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cook Inlet Tug & Barge 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Newbury Park (Westlake) Center (Canew) 317 FTE
NAT-SIZE Center Square Supermarket LLC 317 FTE
NAT-SIZE B&G Foods Snacks, Inc. 317 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nemacolin (460) 317 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.