Elementary and secondary schools · Minnesota

Goodhue County Education District

Red Wing, MN · ~129 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Goodhue County Education District runs at 386% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Elementary and secondary schools workplace, earning a grade F.

Goodhue County Education District: 5.4 TCR = 386% of Elementary and secondary schools BLS 1.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Goodhue County Education District safety composite

Goodhue County Education District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2017→2024

Goodhue County Education District injury rate improved

Goodhue County Education District's TCR fell 4.0 from 5.0 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.0 · 2018=12.4 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Red Wing, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.4 · 386% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #1130/1589
  • PHOTO Baldwin Park Unified…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baldwin Park Unified School District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Goodhue County Education District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Goodhue County Education District averages 5.4 TCR (386% of the Elementary and secondary schools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Goodhue County Education District TCR series: 2017=5 · 2018=12.4 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=5 · 2021=4 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 1.4

Where Goodhue County Education District falls in its industry

3,374 Elementary and secondary schoo establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1130 safest of 1589 Elementary and secondary schoo employers in Minnesota.

Goodhue County Education District (129 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Goodhue County Education District
Goodhue County Education District (129 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Goodhue County Education District has more employees than the Elementary and secondary schools median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2023 6.3 0.9 7 0 0
2022 3.6 2.7 4 0 0
2021 4.0 4.0 4 0 0
2020 5.0 0.0 4 0 0
2019 6.2 2.5 5 0 0
2018 12.4 6.2 10 0 0
2017 5.0 2.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · MN · Red Wing

3,374 Elementary and secondary schools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 68 employers in Red Wing, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baldwin Park Unified School District 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keewahdin Elementary School 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waterford Country School 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champlin Park High 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Long Prairie 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stanton 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knutson Construction Rochester 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE CECO Concrete : Minneapolis 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing 606 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Wing Sala 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Wing, MN 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Wing Shoe Co. - Plant 2 418 FTE
NAT-TCR Rio Roofing, Inc. 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR LTACH at Riverside, LLC (Select Specialty Hospital - Hampton Roads) 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pottsville 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pittsburg 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Luther Family Ford 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recon Refractory & Construction, Inc. 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robert Ganter Contractors Inc 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE LLC 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.