Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Minnesota

Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing

Red Wing, MN · ~606 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade B.

Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing: 5.3 TCR = 71% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing safety composite

Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing: 5.7 → 6.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.41× in 2023

Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing's TCR rose 0.9 from 5.7 in 2017 to 6.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Red Wing, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 5.3 · 71% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #115/249
  • PHOTO Champlain Valley Phy…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 170 inj
  • SIZE ~606 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing averages 5.3 TCR (71% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing TCR series: 2017=5.7 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=7 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=6.6 · BLS 7.5

Where Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #115 safest of 249 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Minnesota.

Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing (606 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing
Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing (606 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing has more employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.6 2.2 27 0 0
2022 4.6 2.2 20 1 0
2021 7.0 4.2 32 0 0
2020 4.8 2.0 22 0 0
2019 4.8 0.0 23 0 0
2018 3.7 1.6 18 1 0
2017 5.7 2.3 28 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MN · Red Wing

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 68 employers in Red Wing, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aspirus Langlade Hospital 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hendrick Medical Center Brownwood 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Memorial Health University Medical Center 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Graco Inc. - Koch Center 607 FTE
STATE-SIZE 401 Nicollet Mall 605 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plunkett's Pest Control 607 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mains'l Services, Inc. 607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Wing Sala 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Wing, MN 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Wing Shoe Co. - Plant 2 418 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3534 291 FTE
NAT-TCR NurseCore of Las Vegas 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR D&D Industries 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenville, OH Yard 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vandalia RHCC 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0083-HES Bossier City LA Industrial 606 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norstan Communications Inc - TX, Austin & (BOA)* 606 FTE
NAT-SIZE McNeil Health Care, LLC 606 FTE
NAT-SIZE P.M.G. Publishing LLC 606 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.