Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) · Idaho

Gooding Heifer Ranch

Jerome, ID · ~127 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gooding Heifer Ranch runs at 280% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Gooding Heifer Ranch: 12.6 TCR = 280% of Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gooding Heifer Ranch safety composite

Gooding Heifer Ranch scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.1

2017→2024

Gooding Heifer Ranch injury rate improved

Gooding Heifer Ranch's TCR fell 18.1 from 21.1 in 2017 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 26.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=21.1 · 2018=26.9 · 2019=15.8 · 2020=13.1 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112112 · Jerome, ID ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.6 · 280% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO JSMM Farms Elgin
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 111 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JSMM Farms Elgin (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Gooding Heifer Ranch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gooding Heifer Ranch averages 12.6 TCR (280% of the Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gooding Heifer Ranch TCR series: 2017=21.1 · 2018=26.9 · 2019=15.8 · 2020=13.1 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=3 · BLS 4.5

Where Gooding Heifer Ranch falls in its industry

165 Cattle feedlots (except stocky establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Cattle feedlots (except stocky employers in Idaho.

Gooding Heifer Ranch (127 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gooding Heifer Ranch
Gooding Heifer Ranch (127 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Gooding Heifer Ranch has more employees than the Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 2.5 6 0 0
2023 4.5 2.5 6 3 0
2022 7.9 5.7 10 4 0
2021 8.6 5.7 12 3 0
2020 13.1 8.1 14 7 0
2019 15.8 9.3 21 1 0
2018 26.9 15.6 23 8 0
2017 21.1 15.6 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112112 · ID · Jerome

165 Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 53 employers in Jerome, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JSMM Farms Elgin 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA Timmerman - Colby 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phillip Himmelfarb Trust 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Canyon Falls Farms 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nashua Builders 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Idaho Milk Products 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE TrussTheForce 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Agropur Jerome 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR Agropur Inc. - Jerome Cheese Co 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jerome Cheese Co 359 FTE
CITY-NEAR True West Beef, LLC 354 FTE
NAT-TCR Glencoe Regional Health 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Stevens -3302 Old Hartford Road Lake Stevens Wa 98258 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR C341 Logan 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express & Suites 12.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bountiful, UT 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Armstrong & Aceves Roofing, Inc. 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Location 3 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Acres Healthcare Center 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.