Trading posts, general merchandise · Florida

Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc.

Tallahassee, FL · ~784 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc. runs at 197% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Trading posts, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade D.

Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc.: 6.7 TCR = 197% of Trading posts, general merchandise BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc. safety composite

Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc.: 4.0 → 8.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2021

Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc.'s TCR rose 4.9 from 4.0 in 2016 to 8.9 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 452990 · Tallahassee, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.7 · 197% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #108/120
  • PHOTO Distribution Center
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 216 inj
  • SIZE ~784 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Distribution Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc. averages 6.7 TCR (197% of the Trading posts, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc. TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=8 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=8.9 · BLS 3.4

Where Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc. falls in its industry

2,120 Trading posts, general merchan establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 120 Trading posts, general merchan employers in Florida.

Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc. (784 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 23 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc.
Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc. (784 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 23 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc. has more employees than the Trading posts, general merchandise median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.9 4.0 49 0 0
2020 7.7 4.6 37 0 0
2019 7.3 4.2 42 0 0
2018 8.0 6.6 45 0 0
2017 4.3 3.6 25 0 0
2016 4.0 3.3 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

452990 · FL · Tallahassee

2,120 Trading posts, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 319 employers in Tallahassee, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Distribution Center 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Lots Store #1762 Buffalo, NY 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Lots Store #4049 LA CANADA, CA 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Lots Store #4518 BRADLEY, IL 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE BROWARD 784 FTE
STATE-SIZE DEL AIR HVAC 783 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLTAB - TAMPA 783 FTE
STATE-SIZE FL-Bradenton 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tallahasse Memorial HealthCare 4,772 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TLH2 2,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA FLORIDA CAPITAL HOSPITAL 1,187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capital Regional Medical Center 1,000 FTE
NAT-TCR Oregon Metal Services 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Palms, The 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Layman Brothers Contracting #854 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PPA Industries, Inc 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden, AR (1527) 784 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amusement Park 784 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prospect EOGH Inc. 784 FTE
NAT-SIZE SF Van Ness 784 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.