Regulation of utilities · California

SF Van Ness

San Francisco, CA · ~784 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SF Van Ness runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Regulation of utilities workplace, earning a grade A.

SF Van Ness: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Regulation of utilities BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SF Van Ness safety composite

SF Van Ness scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SF Van Ness held a steady TCR band

SF Van Ness's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.7 in 2019 to 0.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.7 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 926130 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #1/14
  • PHOTO 41461901--EXXONMOBIL…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~784 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 41461901--EXXONMOBIL-SPRING CAMPUS (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

SF Van Ness in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SF Van Ness averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Regulation of utilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SF Van Ness TCR series: 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.6 · BLS 3.2

Where SF Van Ness falls in its industry

43 Regulation of utilities establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 14 Regulation of utilities employers in California.

SF Van Ness (784 employees, TCR 0.5) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 24 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SF Van Ness
SF Van Ness (784 employees, TCR 0.5) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 4.6

SF Van Ness has more employees than the Regulation of utilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.6 0.3 4 0 0
2021 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2020 0.6 0.1 5 0 0
2019 0.7 0.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

926130 · CA · San Francisco

43 Regulation of utilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 41461901--EXXONMOBIL-SPRING CAMPUS 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 400 R Steet 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Of Sacramento-Engineering Services Division Roll-Up (140013) 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works Department 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABS-0029-0028-06759 FAC-06759-IRVINE-CA 784 FTE
STATE-SIZE misael nunez 783 FTE
STATE-SIZE Joseph J. Albanese, Inc. 783 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salk Institute for Biological Studies 783 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Massey Services 60 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tenet North Shore 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1359-Duke Midwest Region 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Prospect EOGH Inc. 784 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Camden, AR (1527) 784 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Industries Big Bend,Inc. 784 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amusement Park 784 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.