Alcoholic beverages, wine and distilled spirits merchant wholesalers · New Jersey

Gordon Logistics - Building # 96

Edison, NJ · ~29 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gordon Logistics - Building # 96 runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Alcoholic beverages, wine and distilled spirits merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Gordon Logistics - Building # 96: 3.2 TCR = 145% of Alcoholic beverages, wine and distilled spirits merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gordon Logistics - Building # 96 safety composite

Gordon Logistics - Building # 96 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2018→2019

Gordon Logistics - Building # 96 injury rate improved

Gordon Logistics - Building # 96's TCR fell 0.9 from 3.7 in 2018 to 2.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.7 · 2019=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424820 · Edison, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.2 · 145% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO Honolulu, HI
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Honolulu, HI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Gordon Logistics - Building # 96 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gordon Logistics - Building # 96 averages 3.2 TCR (145% of the Alcoholic beverages, wine and distilled spirits merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gordon Logistics - Building # 96 TCR series: 2018=3.7 · 2019=2.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Gordon Logistics - Building # 96 falls in its industry

735 Alcoholic beverages, wine and establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Alcoholic beverages, wine and employers in New Jersey.

Gordon Logistics - Building # 96 (29 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 109 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Gordon Logistics - Building # 96
Gordon Logistics - Building # 96 (29 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 109 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Gordon Logistics - Building # 96 has fewer employees than the Alcoholic beverages, wine and distilled median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2018 3.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424820 · NJ · Edison

735 Alcoholic beverages, wine and distilled spirits merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 227 employers in Edison, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Honolulu, HI 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4818-48180052-1876 SORREL AVE-WC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Balkan Beverage LLC. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winebow Washington 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRP Services Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied Construction Group Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Renda Roads, Inc. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMAC Communications Inc 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR JFK MEDICAL CENTER 3,904 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anthony M Yalensics / JFK 3,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGA9 2,966 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 2,437 FTE
NAT-TCR Hess Print Solutions 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Charts Inc 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodridge Nursing & Rehabilitation 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Daytona Beach Health & Rehabilitation Center 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Product Resources 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kiwi Farming/Packing 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Los Sures Management Company 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Markesan Highway S Plant 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.