Semiconductor assembly and packaging machinery manufacturing · Colorado

Gpd Global, Inc.

Grand Junction, CO · ~25 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gpd Global, Inc. runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Semiconductor assembly and packaging machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Gpd Global, Inc.: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Semiconductor assembly and packaging machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gpd Global, Inc. safety composite

Gpd Global, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2024

Gpd Global, Inc. injury rate improved

Gpd Global, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333242 · Grand Junction, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Diamonex
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Diamonex (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Gpd Global, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gpd Global, Inc. averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Semiconductor assembly and packaging machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gpd Global, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=3 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Gpd Global, Inc. falls in its industry

133 Semiconductor assembly and pac establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Semiconductor assembly and pac employers in Colorado.

Gpd Global, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Gpd Global, Inc.
Gpd Global, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Gpd Global, Inc. has fewer employees than the Semiconductor assembly and packaging mac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.3 0.0 2 0 0
2017 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333242 · CO · Grand Junction

133 Semiconductor assembly and packaging machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 233 employers in Grand Junction, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Diamonex 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daifuku America Clean Room - Oregon 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brooks Automation, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lam Research Corp Chandler Field Office 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Q Ranch, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGL WATER SOLUTIONS, LLC-C6 PLATTEVILLE 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Subterranean Boring Inc 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colorado Energy Nations Co., LLC 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 609 27 1/2 Road 641 FTE
NAT-TCR RC Highway 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Conyers, GA - 25 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Roanoke 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR United Mechanical 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wente Plumbing & Htg. Co., Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pearce 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Willows Assisted Living 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Earth City, MO 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.