Industry profile · NAICS 333242

Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 152 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

152
Employers
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
1,332
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing average 1.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

1.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
152
employers reporting
1,332
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing sector (NAICS 333242) encompasses 152 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 1,332 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.8 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Chesterfield Chesterfield, MI F 7.5
Leading Technologies, Inc. Leechburg, PA F 6.8
1807 West Braker Lane, Building C-100 Austin, TX D 6.3
Lam Research Corp Manassas Field Office Manassas, VA D 6.3
Gekeler Ln. Boise, ID D 5.8
Electro Scientific Industries Inc - Klamath Falls, OR Klamath Falls, OR D 5.7
Kinetic Systems Inc. WAFAB Livermore, CA D 5.6
MTKA04 Kalispell, MT D 5.5
Highvac Corporation Colorado Springs, CO D 5.4
Surface Finishing Technologies,Inc. Clearwater, FL D 5.3
Eugenus Inc. San Jose, CA D 4.7
Means Engineering Carlsbad, CA D 4.6
Brooks Automation, Inc - Texas Austin, TX D 4.6
Wafab International Livermore, CA D 4.3
Talon - Tampa Tampa, FL D 4.2
Talon Innovations Osakis Osakis, MN C 3.9
Clackamas Site Clackamas, OR C 3.6
Talon - Osakis Osakis, MN C 3.5
Plasma-Therm, LLC Saint Petersburg, FL C 3.5
JST Manufacturing (Meridian) Meridian, ID C 3.4
Brooks Automation US, LLC. Livermore Livermore, CA C 3.4
JST Mfg 1 Garden City, ID C 3.2
1257 Elko Drive Sunnyvale, CA C 3.2
Integra Technologies Inc. El Segundo, CA C 3.1
GAC Agawam, MA C 2.9
Talon Innovations Sauk Rapids Sauk Rapids, MN C 2.9
BTU International North Billerica, MA C 2.8
Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office Hillsboro, OR C 2.7
Lam Research Corp Malta Field Office Malta, NY C 2.7
MKS Klamath Falls Klamath Falls, OR C 2.7
MKS Boulder Boulder, CO C 2.7
Intevac Santa Clara Santa Clara, CA B 2.6
PVA TePla America, LLC Corona, CA B 2.5
EMCom Inc. Auburn, NY B 2.5
Talon - Sauk Rapids Sauk Rapids, MN B 2.5
California Operations- Ventura Ventura, CA B 2.5
Daifuku America Clean Room US Chandler, AZ B 2.4
CVD Equipment Corporation Central Islip, NY B 2.4
Creation Technologies MIL Oak Creek, WI B 2.3
Chemcut State College, PA B 2.3
MTK04 - Applied Materials, Semi Tool Kalispell, MT B 2.2
Raith America International Applications Center Troy, NY B 2.2
Hamburg Site Hamburg, NJ B 2.0
Daifuku Cleanroom Automation America Corporation TX Hutto, TX B 2.0
Raith America, Inc. Islandia, NY B 1.9
Revasum San Luis Obispo, CA B 1.8
Brooks Automation Inc - Indiana Indianapolis, IN B 1.7
Ringwood San Jose, CA B 1.7
MKS Wilmington Wilmington, MA A 1.6
Malta Tea Malta, NY A 1.6
Page 1 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Micro-lithography equipment, semiconductor, manufacturing?

This sector averages 1.8 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.