Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Indiana

Graber Post Buildings Inc

Montgomery, IN · ~174 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Graber Post Buildings Inc runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

Graber Post Buildings Inc: 2.8 TCR = 97% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Graber Post Buildings Inc safety composite

Graber Post Buildings Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Graber Post Buildings Inc: 1.1 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Graber Post Buildings Inc's TCR rose 1.3 from 1.1 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Montgomery, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #58/93
  • PHOTO Bedford Park
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~174 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bedford Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Graber Post Buildings Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Graber Post Buildings Inc averages 2.8 TCR (97% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Graber Post Buildings Inc TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=1.7 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 2.9

Where Graber Post Buildings Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 93 Construction management, comme employers in Indiana.

Graber Post Buildings Inc (174 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Graber Post Buildings Inc
Graber Post Buildings Inc (174 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Graber Post Buildings Inc has more employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 0.0 4 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 6 0 0
2022 2.6 1.1 5 0 0
2021 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2018 6.2 0.0 8 0 0
2017 4.5 1.3 7 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · IN · Montgomery

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 4 employers in Montgomery, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bedford Park 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Poli Construction, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pope Construction Co., Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMU City Center 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE PSI Molded Plastics, Inc. 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cleer Vision Windows, LLC 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winamac Coil Spring, Inc. 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nelson Global Products, Inc 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Graber Crews 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSG Trucking INC 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Montgomery, IN 22 FTE
NAT-TCR Gauthier Biomedical 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR trumco/trumbull forest products 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ong Wr Okc Sssc 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Southbrooke Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gill Ranch 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE IKEA #153 Pittsburgh 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diamond Pet Foods - Ripon 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Texas Rehabilitation Center 174 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.