Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Gauthier Biomedical

Grafton, WI · ~100 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gauthier Biomedical runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Gauthier Biomedical: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gauthier Biomedical safety composite

Gauthier Biomedical scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Gauthier Biomedical held a steady TCR band

Gauthier Biomedical's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.0 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Grafton, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #16/24
  • PHOTO Abiomed, Inc. (Woburn)
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Abiomed, Inc. (Woburn) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Gauthier Biomedical in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gauthier Biomedical averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gauthier Biomedical TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Gauthier Biomedical falls in its industry

741 Instruments, mechanical micros establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 24 Instruments, mechanical micros employers in Wisconsin.

Gauthier Biomedical (100 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Gauthier Biomedical
Gauthier Biomedical (100 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Gauthier Biomedical has fewer employees than the Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 1.1 2 0 0
2023 3.4 1.1 3 0 0
2022 3.4 0.0 3 0 0
2021 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2020 2.9 1.9 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.2 2.1 4 0 0
2017 4.1 2.0 4 0 0
2016 2.0 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · WI · Grafton

741 Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 57 employers in Grafton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Abiomed, Inc. (Woburn) 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Complexus Medical 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEHC : Westborough MA, LS 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NH01-SEABK-SEABROOK - NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Area 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE V&V Supremo Foods, Inc. - Browntown 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dawns Foods 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Kenosha 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Medical Center Grafton 1,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grafton Division 418 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kapco Inc. - Badger 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kapco Metal Stamping 286 FTE
NAT-TCR Graber Post Buildings Inc 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ong Wr Okc Sssc 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR trumco/trumbull forest products 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Southbrooke Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Muetzel-Kenny Rd 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yale Industrial Trucks-Tynan, Inc. 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harvard Maintenance Inc of Arizona 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stone Oak Care Center 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.