Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Michigan

Graham Construction

Saginaw, MI · ~33 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Graham Construction runs at 243% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade F.

Graham Construction: 7.0 TCR = 243% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Graham Construction safety composite

Graham Construction scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Graham Construction: 12.7 → 14.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 17.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.24× in 2024

Graham Construction's TCR rose 1.9 from 12.7 in 2016 to 14.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 17.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Saginaw, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 243% of ind

  • DART 8.8 DART
  • RANK #102/121
  • PHOTO M. E. Construction, …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M. E. Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Graham Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Graham Construction averages 7.0 TCR (243% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Graham Construction TCR series: 2016=12.7 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=17.1 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=14.6 · BLS 2.9

Where Graham Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 121 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Michigan.

Graham Construction (33 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Graham Construction
Graham Construction (33 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Graham Construction has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.6 8.8 5 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 17.1 17.1 4 0 0
2020 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.8 3.9 2 0 0
2017 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 12.7 8.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MI · Saginaw

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 278 employers in Saginaw, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M. E. Construction, Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hard Surface Finishers 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sharp Construction.LLC 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Academy at Mapleton Hill 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRH GROUP LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Rivers Svc Ctr 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alpena Power Company 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Treatment City of Wyoming 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nexteer Automotive Saginaw Site 4,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 700 Cooper 2,129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morley - Saginaw 2,039 FTE
CITY-NEAR Caravan Facilities Management 1,677 FTE
NAT-TCR Fishermen's Community Hospital 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Life Care Center of Citrus County 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sauer Health Care 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aston 10531 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holmes Lumber 497 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ord Chicago O Hare Airport 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Akins Excavating CO 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stoneledge Furniture LLC- Palmdale 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.