Anklets, sheer hosiery or socks, knitting or knitting and finishing · North Carolina

Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc

Burlington, NC · ~47 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Anklets, sheer hosiery or socks, knitting or knitting and finishing workplace, earning a grade A.

Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Anklets, sheer hosiery or socks, knitting or knitting and finishing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc safety composite

Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc held a steady TCR band

Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 315110 · Burlington, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/12
  • PHOTO Renfro - Cleveland P…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Renfro - Cleveland Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Anklets, sheer hosiery or socks, knitting or knitting and finishing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc TCR series: 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc falls in its industry

25 Anklets, sheer hosiery or sock establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 12 Anklets, sheer hosiery or sock employers in North Carolina.

Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc (47 employees, TCR 1.4) among 19 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 20 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc
Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc (47 employees, TCR 1.4) among 19 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Graham Dyeing & Finishing, Inc has fewer employees than the Anklets, sheer hosiery or socks, knittin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2022 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

315110 · NC · Burlington

25 Anklets, sheer hosiery or socks, knitting or knitting and finishing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 148 employers in Burlington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Renfro - Cleveland Plant 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FBF ORIGINALS 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR THMills, Inc. Rockwell 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Front Street 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monroe NC Operations 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan River Steam Station 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hickory Resource Center PNG 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smith Douglas Charlotte 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR National OnDemand, Inc 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR Twin Lakes Community 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR York Road 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County 373 FTE
NAT-TCR Valero Enterprises, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR GO & JJ Investments Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Brentwood Originals - RV 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Plano 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Ormond Beach West 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE G Builders, LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE IS Acquisition, INC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Us Autoforce Alsip 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.