Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance · Georgia

Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal

Augusta, GA · ~90 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance workplace, earning a grade B.

Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal: 3.4 TCR = 76% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal safety composite

Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal: 3.3 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.63× in 2023

Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal's TCR rose 0.4 from 3.3 in 2022 to 3.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · Augusta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.4 · 76% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #20/39
  • PHOTO Transport Service 60…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Transport Service 60801 Toledo, OH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal averages 3.4 TCR (76% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal TCR series: 2022=3.3 · 2023=3.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal falls in its industry

1,026 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 39 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in Georgia.

Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal (90 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal
Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal (90 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Grammer Logistics Augusta Terminal has more employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.6 2.2 5 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · GA · Augusta

1,026 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 373 employers in Augusta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Transport Service 60801 Toledo, OH 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NY - Baldwinsville 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLIF - 824 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR J-Mar Enterprises, Inc. - Fgo 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Structor Group, Inc. 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE MetroPower Inc BR 2, 8 & 85 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Safe Aire Heating and Cooling Company, Inc. 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daybreak Industrial Inc 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA COKE 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR AU Medical Center, Inc. 5,630 FTE
NAT-TCR ISD #97 Moose Lake 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR E. Butler, PA 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sioux Area Metro 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Anning-Johnson Company Illinois 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hanson Truss Components Inc. 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Mountain Inc. 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE 14 - Raleigh 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canam Steel Corporation, South Plainfield 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.