Distribution of electric power · Michigan

Grand Haven Board of Light and Power

Grand Haven, MI · ~48 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Haven Board of Light and Power runs at 516% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Grand Haven Board of Light and Power: 6.2 TCR = 516% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Haven Board of Light and Power safety composite

Grand Haven Board of Light and Power scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.5

2019→2024

Grand Haven Board of Light and Power injury rate improved

Grand Haven Board of Light and Power's TCR fell 14.5 from 14.5 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=14.5 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=12.0 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Grand Haven, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.2 · 516% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #62/63
  • PHOTO Glenwood Headquarters
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Glenwood Headquarters (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Grand Haven Board of Light and Power in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Haven Board of Light and Power averages 6.2 TCR (516% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grand Haven Board of Light and Power TCR series: 2019=14.5 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=12 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Grand Haven Board of Light and Power falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 63 Distribution of electric power employers in Michigan.

Grand Haven Board of Light and Power (48 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Haven Board of Light and Power
Grand Haven Board of Light and Power (48 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Grand Haven Board of Light and Power has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 12.0 12.0 5 0 0
2021 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2020 5.8 3.9 3 0 0
2019 14.5 10.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MI · Grand Haven

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 81 employers in Grand Haven, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Glenwood Headquarters 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ROSEVILLE SERVICE CENTER 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corporation (Murfreesboro) 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Operations Center (WOC) 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sietsema Farms 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.M. Longyear, LLC - Office & Forestry 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Top Grade Aggregates, LLC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Haven Area Public Schools 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shape Corp - 14600 172nd Ave. 592 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Ottawa Community Hospital 450 FTE
CITY-NEAR TH Grand Haven Hospital-MH-MI 409 FTE
NAT-TCR Radecki 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Montpelier VT FXFE-MPV 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR East Bethel Elementary School 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 3014 N. Wygant Portland OR 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Republic Diesel, Inc 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE 62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Curry Chevrolet 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ardu Recovery Center 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.