Motor freight carrier, general, local · Colorado

Grand Junction Trucking

Grand Junction, CO · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Junction Trucking runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Motor freight carrier, general, local workplace, earning a grade A.

Grand Junction Trucking: 1.8 TCR = 39% of Motor freight carrier, general, local BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Junction Trucking safety composite

Grand Junction Trucking scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Grand Junction Trucking: 0.0 → 4.9 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Grand Junction Trucking's TCR rose 4.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Grand Junction, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/37
  • PHOTO Ripato Trucking, LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ripato Trucking, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Grand Junction Trucking in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Junction Trucking averages 1.8 TCR (39% of the Motor freight carrier, general, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grand Junction Trucking TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=4.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Grand Junction Trucking falls in its industry

2,784 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 37 Motor freight carrier, general employers in Colorado.

Grand Junction Trucking (21 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Junction Trucking
Grand Junction Trucking (21 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Grand Junction Trucking has fewer employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, local median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · CO · Grand Junction

2,784 Motor freight carrier, general, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 233 employers in Grand Junction, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ripato Trucking, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jimmy T. Woods 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kay Polymer Trucking Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SNL Distribution Services Corp-New Orleans 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sacred Seed 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGL WATER SOLUTIONS, LLC-C3 LASALLE 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE WGW Golden West Wind 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE BHE - Canon City Utility Dr (CO008) 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 609 27 1/2 Road 641 FTE
NAT-TCR HealthStar - Cass Lake 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Bronze Craft Corp. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SONIC DRIVE-IN Camp Pendleton #6280 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Champion Fowlerville 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE La Grange 3121 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE D6 Lincoln Yard 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern States Flemingsburg Coop 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern States Owenton Coop 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.