Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · Minnesota

Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc

Grand Rapids, MN · ~46 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc runs at 251% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade F.

Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc: 8.6 TCR = 251% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc safety composite

Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc: 0.0 → 32.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 32.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.95× in 2024

Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc's TCR rose 32.4 from 0.0 in 2018 to 32.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Grand Rapids, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 251% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #220/240
  • PHOTO Sawgrass Ford, Inc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sawgrass Ford, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc averages 8.6 TCR (251% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=12.3 · 2024=32.4 · BLS 3.4

Where Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #220 safest of 240 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in Minnesota.

Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc (46 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc
Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc (46 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc has fewer employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 32.4 8.1 3 1 0
2023 12.3 2.5 5 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2020 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2019 9.9 5.0 2 2 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · MN · Grand Rapids

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 75 employers in Grand Rapids, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sawgrass Ford, Inc 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morries Mercedes-Benz of St Paul 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR HARDY FAMILY FORD 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosen Hyundai of Algonquin 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Canby 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elk River Municipal Utilities 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogers 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE District Energy Saint Paul 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Itasca Clinic & Hospital 706 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Itasca Clniic & Hospital 665 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1609 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1609 301 FTE
NAT-TCR Van Metre Broadlands / New Homes Const. 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Steel Erectors, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR JaMar Packaging 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rome Enterprises, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE P/W of Ahoskie INC 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE De Bella Mechanical Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palmer Logistics Warehouse 12 (4111 Malone) 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE C&T Plumbing, LLC 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.