Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Illinois

JaMar Packaging

West Chicago, IL · ~42 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JaMar Packaging runs at 259% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

JaMar Packaging: 8.6 TCR = 259% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JaMar Packaging safety composite

JaMar Packaging scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2018→2024

JaMar Packaging injury rate improved

JaMar Packaging's TCR fell 11.6 from 11.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.6 · 2019=13.1 · 2020=15.5 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=11.1 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · West Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 259% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #85/86
  • PHOTO Massachusetts Contai…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Massachusetts Container Coporation (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

JaMar Packaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JaMar Packaging averages 8.6 TCR (259% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JaMar Packaging TCR series: 2018=11.6 · 2019=13.1 · 2020=15.5 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=11.1 · 2023=4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where JaMar Packaging falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #85 safest of 86 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Illinois.

JaMar Packaging (42 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate JaMar Packaging
JaMar Packaging (42 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

JaMar Packaging has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2022 11.1 0.0 4 0 0
2021 4.5 0.0 2 0 0
2020 15.5 15.5 6 0 0
2019 13.1 7.9 5 0 0
2018 11.6 4.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · IL · West Chicago

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 123 employers in West Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Massachusetts Container Coporation 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR New England Wooden Ware Corp 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GMPC 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Volk Packaging Corporation 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE DAS Pontiac, IL 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waterman, IL-R&D 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springfield IL 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Egyptian Electric Cooperative 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Jel Sert Company 830 FTE
CITY-NEAR BALL HORTICULTURAL COMPANY 713 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SIL3 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Siemens West Chicago 342 FTE
NAT-TCR Grand Rapids Chevrolet Buick cadillac gmc 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jones Truck & Equipment LLC 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Van Metre Broadlands / New Homes Const. 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR L & L Construction, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cloeren Wisconsin 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wasa Electrical Services, Inc. MAUI 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Islip 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 50084 - CAPSTONE UNFI Ridgefield WA 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.