Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Idaho

Grand Teton Service Group

Idaho Falls, ID · ~235 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Teton Service Group runs at 262% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

Grand Teton Service Group: 10.0 TCR = 262% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Teton Service Group safety composite

Grand Teton Service Group scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2017→2023

Grand Teton Service Group injury rate improved

Grand Teton Service Group's TCR fell 8.2 from 14.6 in 2017 to 6.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.6 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=12.9 · 2021=9.8 · 2023=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Idaho Falls, ID ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 262% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/33
  • PHOTO 2003-UCPMC-CARUSO CR…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 98 inj
  • SIZE ~235 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2003-UCPMC-CARUSO CRP(CORAL) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Grand Teton Service Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Teton Service Group averages 10.0 TCR (262% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grand Teton Service Group TCR series: 2017=14.6 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=12.9 · 2021=9.8 · 2023=6.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Grand Teton Service Group falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 33 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Idaho.

Grand Teton Service Group (235 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Teton Service Group
Grand Teton Service Group (235 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Grand Teton Service Group has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.4 0.0 17 0 0
2021 9.8 8.5 24 0 0
2020 12.9 9.9 26 0 0
2019 6.2 1.8 12 2 0
2017 14.6 2.8 19 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · ID · Idaho Falls

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 189 employers in Idaho Falls, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2003-UCPMC-CARUSO CRP(CORAL) 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vista Care - WI Alpine 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Easterseals - 1 Mammoth Rd-Manchester 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clarkson Apartments 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 701-00613 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Trailer Co. 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dickinson Frozen Foods 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Independent Food Corp 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOUNTAIN VIEW HOSPITAL 1,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center 1,479 FTE
CITY-NEAR Idaho Falls Community Hospital 536 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5494 472 FTE
NAT-TCR Nursing Home Facility 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR McKay's Market Lincoln City #28 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Arden Courts of Sarasota 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Biffs Inc 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tucci & Sons, Inc. 235 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMF Automation Technologies, LLC 235 FTE
NAT-SIZE Honeywell Intelligrated - Danville 235 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seyer Industries 235 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.