Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid · Michigan

Granger Waste Services, Inc.

Lansing, MI · ~338 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Granger Waste Services, Inc. runs at 389% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid workplace, earning a grade F.

Granger Waste Services, Inc.: 10.1 TCR = 389% of Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid BLS 2.6 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Granger Waste Services, Inc. safety composite

Granger Waste Services, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2021→2024

Granger Waste Services, Inc. injury rate improved

Granger Waste Services, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.3 from 11.3 in 2021 to 8.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=11.3 · 2022=11.9 · 2023=9.2 · 2024=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Lansing, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 389% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #69/80
  • PHOTO Wigand Disposal Comp…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 151 inj
  • SIZE ~338 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wigand Disposal Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Granger Waste Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Granger Waste Services, Inc. averages 10.1 TCR (389% of the Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Granger Waste Services, Inc. TCR series: 2021=11.3 · 2022=11.9 · 2023=9.2 · 2024=8 · BLS 2.6

Where Granger Waste Services, Inc. falls in its industry

2,322 Waste collection services, non establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 80 Waste collection services, non employers in Michigan.

Granger Waste Services, Inc. (338 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Granger Waste Services, Inc.
Granger Waste Services, Inc. (338 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Granger Waste Services, Inc. has more employees than the Waste collection services, nonhazardous median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 6.4 31 0 0
2023 9.2 7.0 37 0 0
2022 11.9 10.4 45 1 0
2021 11.3 7.8 38 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · MI · Lansing

2,322 Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 410 employers in Lansing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wigand Disposal Company 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AZO Services INC 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JE Gibson Inc 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR WALTERS RECYCLING & REFUSE INC. 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eisenhower Center of Ann Arbor 338 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Traverse Pavilions 338 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ground Effects, LLC - Flint Facility 338 FTE
STATE-SIZE C.A. Hull Co., Inc. 337 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCC - Main 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Grand River Assembly 1,648 FTE
NAT-TCR Alwin - Winfield 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Yellowstone Plastics, Inc 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR New England Wire Technologies Corporation 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 241 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jasper County 338 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pueblo Chemical Plant 338 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huf North America Automotive Parts Manufacturing Corp. 338 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crockett Hospital LLC 338 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.