Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) · Kansas

Gray County Feed Yard

Cimarron, KS · ~30 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gray County Feed Yard runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) workplace, earning a grade C.

Gray County Feed Yard: 4.7 TCR = 104% of Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gray County Feed Yard safety composite

Gray County Feed Yard scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2016→2024

Gray County Feed Yard injury rate improved

Gray County Feed Yard's TCR fell 5.1 from 7.4 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=5.0 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112112 · Cimarron, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.7 · 104% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #14/50
  • PHOTO Hale Center Feedyard
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hale Center Feedyard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Gray County Feed Yard in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gray County Feed Yard averages 4.7 TCR (104% of the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gray County Feed Yard TCR series: 2016=7.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=5 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Gray County Feed Yard falls in its industry

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except s establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 50 Beef cattle feedlots (except s employers in Kansas.

Gray County Feed Yard (30 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gray County Feed Yard
Gray County Feed Yard (30 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Gray County Feed Yard has fewer employees than the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2023 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2022 8.1 8.1 3 0 0
2021 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 7.3 7.3 3 0 0
2019 7.3 4.9 3 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.4 7.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112112 · KS · Cimarron

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 3 employers in Cimarron, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hale Center Feedyard 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Eckley 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Beef LLC 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Friona Feedyard 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trinity Feedyard LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Centerfire Feedyard 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookover Ranch Feedyard 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keesecker Agri Business 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spandet Dairy KS 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davis Electric, Inc. 63 FTE
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #71 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Visioneering, Inc - Auburn Hills 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Drug Plastics and Glass Co., Inc. - Valley City, ND 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tampa Terminal 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Landes Trucking 72059 Dayton 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richmond Distribution 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE E & L Development, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Water Tech Transportation, LLC 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.