Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers · Michigan

Great Lakes Ann Arbor

Ann Arbor, MI · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Great Lakes Ann Arbor runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Great Lakes Ann Arbor: 0.6 TCR = 29% of Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Great Lakes Ann Arbor safety composite

Great Lakes Ann Arbor scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2023

Great Lakes Ann Arbor injury rate improved

Great Lakes Ann Arbor's TCR fell 5.0 from 5.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424690 · Ann Arbor, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/28
  • PHOTO Tampa-PLT
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tampa-PLT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Great Lakes Ann Arbor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Great Lakes Ann Arbor averages 0.6 TCR (29% of the Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Great Lakes Ann Arbor TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Great Lakes Ann Arbor falls in its industry

766 Other Chemical and Allied Prod establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 28 Other Chemical and Allied Prod employers in Michigan.

Great Lakes Ann Arbor (22 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Great Lakes Ann Arbor
Great Lakes Ann Arbor (22 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Great Lakes Ann Arbor has fewer employees than the Other Chemical and Allied Products Merch median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.0 5.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424690 · MI · Ann Arbor

766 Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 271 employers in Ann Arbor, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tampa-PLT 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gas Innovations 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harvey Distribution 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Skymint Silo59 Production Facility 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRT Brighton 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cadillac Renewable Energy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benzonia 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital-AnnArbor 5,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Mercy Hospital-Ann Arbor 5,554 FTE
CITY-NEAR IHA Health Services Corporation 2,533 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Ann Arbor 1,090 FTE
NAT-TCR Northeast Hingham Plant 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tampa-PLT 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Guardant Health 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Aeroseal, LLC. 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Airgas Specialty Products - Riverside 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rochester Plant(Deep Rock Rd) 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rock Hill Distribution 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baton Rouge Branch 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.