Compressed gases (except LP gas) merchant wholesalers · Minnesota

Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc.

Roseville, MN · ~39 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Compressed gases (except LP gas) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc.: 0.6 TCR = 29% of Compressed gases (except LP gas) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. safety composite

Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc.: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc.'s TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2022 to 1.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424690 · Roseville, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/18
  • PHOTO Gas Innovations
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gas Innovations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. averages 0.6 TCR (29% of the Compressed gases (except LP gas) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.2

Where Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. falls in its industry

766 Compressed gases (except LP ga establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 18 Compressed gases (except LP ga employers in Minnesota.

Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. (39 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc.
Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. (39 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Roseville Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. has more employees than the Compressed gases (except LP gas) merchan median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424690 · MN · Roseville

766 Compressed gases (except LP gas) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 239 employers in Roseville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gas Innovations 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harvey Distribution 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Ann Arbor 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tampa-PLT 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Detroit Lakes Hatchery 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Your Home Improvement Company - St Cloud 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AP Shared Services 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Dental/The Dental Specialist 1,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Veritas Technologies LLC - Roseville 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2101 - Roseville T1 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Location 56012 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Richmond 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SymbolArts 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona Dept. of Corrections-Globe 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE SuperPower Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Francisco, CA 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foster 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Trailer Corporation LLC 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.