Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers · Ohio

Great Lakes Columbus

Columbus, OH · ~28 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Great Lakes Columbus runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Great Lakes Columbus: 2.2 TCR = 99% of Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Great Lakes Columbus safety composite

Great Lakes Columbus scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2016→2023

Great Lakes Columbus injury rate improved

Great Lakes Columbus's TCR fell 7.2 from 7.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.2 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424690 · Columbus, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.2 · 99% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #36/53
  • PHOTO REN444
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: REN444 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Great Lakes Columbus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Great Lakes Columbus averages 2.2 TCR (99% of the Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Great Lakes Columbus TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Great Lakes Columbus falls in its industry

766 Other Chemical and Allied Prod establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 53 Other Chemical and Allied Prod employers in Ohio.

Great Lakes Columbus (28 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Great Lakes Columbus
Great Lakes Columbus (28 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Great Lakes Columbus has fewer employees than the Other Chemical and Allied Products Merch median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.3 6.3 2 0 0
2016 7.2 3.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424690 · OH · Columbus

766 Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR REN444 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Homer 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portland IS/NFF 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reagent Chemical - Channelview 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE H and M Building 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fine Oak Farm 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Canton Hatchery 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Small's Sand & Gravel, Inc. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Endeavor Air, Inc. - LGA Tech Ops 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR IA - Corteva (Cedar Rapids) 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoschton 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 839 - Des Moines Branch 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midwest - South Chicago Heights 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Early Education Center-Caruso 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Youth Work Services-Central 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Start LA 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.