Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen

Holmen, WI · ~46 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen: 7.1 TCR = 186% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen safety composite

Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen: 5.9 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2024

Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen's TCR rose 2.3 from 5.9 in 2023 to 8.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Holmen, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 186% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #163/273
  • PHOTO Ivy Park at Studio C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ivy Park at Studio City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen averages 7.1 TCR (186% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen TCR series: 2023=5.9 · 2024=8.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #163 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen (46 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen
Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen (46 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Great Lakes Management GTHI Caretta Holmen has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2023 5.9 5.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Holmen

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 13 employers in Holmen, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Studio City 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blue Ridge Assisted Living & Memory Care 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Management GTHI Hayden Grove 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Christian Village 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services - Wisconsin 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baraboo Operations 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schuh General Construction 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holtz Builders, Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI520 - HOLMEN 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Engraving Corporation - Holmen 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR 546 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Holmen 45 FTE
NAT-TCR Fv Chisago Clinic 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fullen Dock and Warehouse 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1072 East Brea 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Charlottesville Office 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE NORWALK 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercantile Development Inc 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE RCUH/Core Staff 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.